Key result
Exenatide and glucagon co-infusion significantly increased myocardial glucose uptake and improved markers of diastolic dysfunction compared to saline in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Type 2 diabetes significantly increases the risk of heart failure, and the effects of GLP-1 and glucagon dual receptor agonism on myocardial glucose uptake and myocardial function in type 2 diabetes remained to be explored.
Does exenatide and glucagon co-infusion increase myocardial glucose uptake and improve myocardial function in adults with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=8)
Single-blind
Latin square block design
No
Does exenatide and glucagon co-infusion increase myocardial glucose uptake and improve myocardial function in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: r = 0.79
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 9.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
In adults with type 2 diabetes, acute co-infusion of exenatide and glucagon increases myocardial glucose uptake and improves markers of diastolic function, suggesting potential cardiovascular benefits of dual GLP-1/glucagon agonism.
Supports dual agonism exploration for diastolic markers in T2D; leaves open clinical outcome benefits.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) significantly increases the risk of heart failure, a major cause of hospitalisation and increased morbidity and mortality. Dual and multi-agonist synthetic peptides at the GLP-1 and glucagon receptor are in clinical development as potential new treatments for a range of chronic metabolic conditions including T2D. Here, we aimed to explore the effects of GLP-1 and glucagon dual receptor agonism on myocardial glucose uptake (MGU) and myocardial function in T2D. Eight adults with a mean age of 52 ± 12 years and body mass index 31 ± 4 kg/m 2 attended three randomised infusion visits using combinations of 0.9% saline, glucagon (12.5 ng/kg/min) and exenatide:glucagon co-infusion (exenatide loading dose 50 ng/min for 30 min then 25 ng/min). MGU and myocardial function were assessed using 18 F-FDG PET-MRI. MGU increased in n = 7/8 (88%) participants from a median of 9.2 × 10 −3 µmol/g/min (IQR 0.33–19 × 10 −3 µmol/g/min) with saline, to 20 × 10 −3 µmol/g/min (5.4–98 × 10 −3 µmol/g/min) with exenatide:glucagon, n = 8, z = 2.24, r = 0.79, P < 0.05. Exenatide:glucagon significantly increased the median left ventricular global peak diastolic circumferential strain rate from 0.619 1/s (0.580–0.716 1/s) to 0.686 1/s (0.644–0.737 1/s) n = 8, z = 2.37, r = 0.84, P < 0.05. Left ventricular global longitudinal contraction (as a measure global longitudinal strain) numerically increased by 0.6%, from − 16.0% with saline (-14.0-[-16.7]%) to -16.6% with exenatide:glucagon (-14.1-[-17.6]%), n = 8, z =-1.54, r=- 0.54, P = 0.123. Further studies are required to explore whether GLP-1/glucagon dual receptor agonists have a role to play in reducing cardiovascular risk and attenuating heart failure related outcomes in patients with chronic metabolic conditions such as T2D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodman et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=8). Exenatide and glucagon co-infusion vs. 0.9% saline was evaluated on Myocardial glucose uptake (x10^-3 µmol/g/min) (r = 0.79, p=<0.05). Exenatide and glucagon co-infusion significantly increased myocardial glucose uptake and improved markers of diastolic dysfunction compared to saline in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: