Key result
The number of stents was an independent risk factor for stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with each additional stent increasing the risk by 38% (adjusted OR 1.38).
Why the study?
Stent restenosis remains a major challenge after PCI, but studies examining the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited.
Does the number of stents implanted during PCI increase the risk of stent restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=2,338)
No
Does the number of stents implanted during PCI increase the risk of stent restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease?
Implanting more than two stents during percutaneous coronary intervention independently and significantly increases the risk of subsequent stent restenosis, particularly in older and female patients.
May warrant caution with multiple stents in PCI; leaves open optimal strategies for randomized trials.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited.The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis.A retrospective cohort study of data reuse.From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1-2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3-5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously.The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=2,338). Number of stents vs. Fewer stents was evaluated on Stent restenosis detected by follow-up angiography (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.66, p=< .001). The number of stents was an independent risk factor for stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with each additional stent increasing the risk by 38% (adjusted OR 1.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: