Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is associated with cancer development, survival, and tumor recurrence. A barrier to its use is the inability to interpret changes in CRP levels. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine when a change in CRP is clinically meaningful. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cancer patients. Those with a solid tumor diagnosis and at least two consecutive CRP measurements postdiagnosis were included. Subjects were divided into Baseline High CRP (bHCRP; CRP ≥ 10 mg/L) and Baseline Normal CRP groups (bNCRP; CRP < 10 mg/L), We identified appropriate CRP cut-off points for CRP levels changes; compared bHCRP and bNCRP; constructed Kaplan- Meier survival plots and Cox Proportional Hazard Model to confirm cut-off points in each group. Results: 1473 were eligible. In bHCRP group, Overall survival (OS) Mean (Standard Error) was 87(2) and 81(4) months for ≥ 50% vs < 50% CRP decrease respectively. In bNCRP group, OS was 90(3) and 105(3) months for ≥ 2x vs < 2x increase in CRP levels, respectively. These differences remained significant after adjusting for confounders. Conclusion: After a baseline normal CRP an increase of 2-fold or greater was associated with clinical and statistically significantly shorter OS. Conversely, after a baseline high CRP a 50% or greater decrease from baseline was associated with longer OS. Quantification of clinically meaningful CRP change could impact more effective CRP use as a biomarker, prognostic indicator and aid therapeutic decision making. This is especially important to reduce healthcare disparities in financially struggling healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lasheen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: