Key result
Participants enrolled after a more extensive two-step physical activity screening process had significantly higher baseline physical activity levels (8166 vs 7057 steps/day) compared to those screened with a single-item measure.
Why the study?
Does the Active Australia Survey screening compared to a single-item measure result in different baseline physical activity levels among recruited participants?
Observational (n=504)
Does the Active Australia Survey screening compared to a single-item measure result in different baseline physical activity levels among recruited participants?
Absolute Event Rate: 8166% vs 7057%
p-value: p=0.001
Using more extensive screening measures like the Active Australia Survey may inadvertently include participants with higher physical activity levels, potentially introducing bias in trials targeting inactive populations.
More extensive screening may bias inactivity trials toward higher baseline activity; challenges single-item measures for targeting truly sedentary participants.
UNLABELLED: Screening physical activity levels is common in trials to increase physical activity in inactive populations. Commonly applied single-item screening tools might not always be effective in identifying those who are inactive. We applied the more extensive Active Australia Survey to identify inactive people among those who had initially been misclassified as too active using a single-item measure. Those enrolled after the Active Australia Survey screening had significantly higher physical activity levels at subsequent baseline assessment. Thus, more extensive screening measures might result in the inclusion of participants who would otherwise be excluded, possibly introducing unwanted bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000157976.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vandelanotte et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Physical inactivity (n=504). Two-step physical activity screening vs. Single-step physical activity screening was evaluated on Baseline physical activity (Actigraph Accelerometry steps/day) (p=0.001). Participants enrolled after a more extensive two-step physical activity screening process had significantly higher baseline physical activity levels (8166 vs 7057 steps/day) compared to those screened with a single-item measure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: