Key result
Rapid atrial pacing progressively worsens diastolic relaxation and stiffness specifically in HFpEF models.
Why the study?
Diastolic dysfunction in a murine HFpEF model might be difficult to detect under resting conditions without pacing.
Does a pacing-controlled PV loop protocol improve the detection of diastolic dysfunction in a murine HFpEF model compared to resting conditions?
Does a pacing-controlled PV loop protocol improve the detection of diastolic dysfunction in a murine HFpEF model compared to resting conditions?
A novel pacing-controlled PV loop protocol enables the detection of latent diastolic dysfunction in a mouse model of HFpEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables detection of rate-dependent diastolic dysfunction in murine HFpEF models; leaves open translation to clinical assessment.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), characterized by diastolic dysfunction and insufficient exercise capacity, is a growing health problem worldwide. One major difficulty with experimental research on HFpEF is the lack of methods to consistently detect diastolic dysfunction in mouse models. We developed a pacing-controlled pressure-volume (PV) loop protocol for the assessment of diastolic function at different heart rates in mice and tested if the protocol could detect diastolic dysfunction specific to a HFpEF model. A HFpEF model was generated by high-fat diet (HFD) feeding with concomitant NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester administration, and a pressure-overload hypertrophy (PO) model was produced by surgical constriction of the transverse aorta (TAC). Heart rate (HR) was slowed below 400 beats/min by intraperitoneal injection of ivabradine. PV loop data were acquired and analyzed at HR incrementing from 400 to 700 beats/min via atrial pacing using a miniature pacing catheter inserted into the esophagus, and comparisons were made among control, HFpEF, and PO mice. At baseline without pacing, no diastolic abnormalities were detected in either PO or HFpEF models. Frequency-diastolic relations, however, revealed the significant diastolic impairment specific to the HFpEF model; both relaxation time constant (Tau) and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR) were worsened as heart rate increased. Peak positive first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax) was significantly lower in HFpEF versus controls only at a high HR of 700 beats/min. A pacing-controlled protocol would be a feasible and potent method to detect diastolic dysfunction specific to a mouse HFpEF model.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We developed a pacing-controlled PV loop protocol for the assessment of diastolic function at different heart rates in mice, which is a feasible and potent method for the characterization of diastolic dysfunction in a murine HFpEF model whose diastolic dysfunction might be difficult to be detected under resting conditions without pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Numata et al. (2022) studied Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in mice. Pacing-controlled pressure-volume (PV) loop protocol via esophageal atrial pacing after ivabradine administration vs. Baseline without pacing, control mice, and pressure-overload hypertrophy mice was evaluated on Frequency-diastolic relations: relaxation time constant (Tau) and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR). Atrial pacing from 400 to 700 beats/min revealed significant worsening of Tau and EDPVR specific to HFpEF mice, and lower dP/dtmax versus controls at 700 beats/min.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: