Key result
Lercanidipine decreased pulse pressure by 10.6 mm Hg, amlodipine by 7.0 mm Hg, and benidipine by 8.9 mm Hg, with benidipine showing a statistically significant difference compared to the other two drugs.
Why the study?
Pulse pressure is an important treatment target associated with arterial stiffness and target organ damage, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers can reduce it.
Does lercanidipine or amlodipine monotherapy improve pulse pressure more effectively than benidipine in hypertensive patients?
Cohort (n=1,050)
Yes
Does lercanidipine or amlodipine monotherapy improve pulse pressure more effectively than benidipine in hypertensive patients?
Lercanidipine and amlodipine monotherapy provide greater reductions in brachial pulse pressure compared to benidipine in hypertensive patients, suggesting potentially better cardioprotective effects.
Background and Objective: High blood pressure (BP) in elderly patients is associated with arterial stiffness, which in turn increases central SBP and pulse pressure (PP). The PP, assessed with accurate methods or as brachial SBP-DBP (bPP), triggers target organ damage and cardiovascular outcomes. Considering this relationship, PP is an important treatment target. Dihydropyridine calcium blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors decrease, both, brachial and central PP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in bPP obtained in hypertensive patients. Materials and Methods: The hypertensive patients were treated for 6 months, with amlodipine, (10 mg/day), benidipine (8 mg/day) and lercanidipine (10 mg/day). Pulse pressure, blood pressure, blood pressure control values of lercanidipine, benidipine and amlodipine groups were compared. The statistical analysis of the data was performed using the software (SAS version 9.0). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At the end of the follow-up, bPP was decreased by 8.9 mm Hg with amlodipine, 7.0 mm Hg with benidipine and 10.6 mm Hg with lercanidipine, with a statistically significant difference between benidipine and both amlodipine and lercanidipine (p<0.05). No significant difference was obtained between amlodipine and lercanidipine. All the drugs also lowered BP, however, amlodipine and benidipine, decreased less than lercanidipine SBP (p<0.05). Conclusion: Current results suggested a lesser potential cardioprotective effect of benidipine, compared with amlodipine and lercanidipine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesco et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=1,050). Lercanidipine, Amlodipine, and Benidipine vs. Each other was evaluated on Change in pulse pressure at 6 months (p=<0.05). Lercanidipine decreased pulse pressure by 10.6 mm Hg, amlodipine by 7.0 mm Hg, and benidipine by 8.9 mm Hg, with benidipine showing a statistically significant difference compared to the other two drugs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: