Why the study?
Does a multidimensional preoperative intervention reduce postoperative length of stay in low-risk patients awaiting elective CABG?
Does a multidimensional preoperative intervention reduce postoperative length of stay in low-risk patients awaiting elective CABG?
A preoperative intervention consisting of exercise, education, and nursing support significantly reduces hospital length of stay and improves quality of life in patients awaiting elective CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preoperative multidimensional intervention to shorten elective CABG stay; extends prehabilitation evidence in cardiac surgery.
BACKGROUND: In publicly funded health care systems, a waiting period for such services as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is common. The possibility of using the waiting period to improve patient outcomes should be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a multidimensional preoperative intervention on presurgery and postsurgery outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective CABG. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A regional cardiovascular surgery center in a tertiary care hospital, southwestern Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: 249 patients on a waiting list for elective CABG whose surgeries were scheduled for a minimum of 10 weeks from the time of study recruitment. INTERVENTION: During the waiting period, the treatment group received exercise training twice per week, education and reinforcement, and monthly nurse-initiated telephone calls. After surgery, participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program was offered to all patients. MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative length of stay was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were exercise performance, general health-related quality of life, social support, anxiety, and utilization of health care services. RESULTS: Length of stay differed significantly between groups. Patients who received the preoperative intervention spent 1 less day [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.0 day] in the hospital overall (P = 0.002) and less time in the intensive care unit (median, 2.1 hours [CI, -1.2 to 16 hours]; P = 0.001). During the waiting period, patients in the intervention group had a better quality of life than controls. Improved quality of life continued up to 6 months after surgery. Mortality rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: The waiting period for elective procedures, such as CABG, may be used to enhance in-hospital and early-phase recovery, improving patients' functional abilities and quality of life while reducing their hospital stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heather M. Arthur (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: