Key result
Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) accurately predicted invasive IMR > 40U with an area under the curve of 0.96, offering a pressure-wire-free alternative for assessing coronary microcirculation in STEMI.
Why the study?
Pressure-wire measurement of IMR in STEMI has practical restrictions, prompting the need for a pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation.
Does angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) accurately estimate invasive IMR and predict microvascular obstruction in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=45)
Single-blind
No
Does angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) accurately estimate invasive IMR and predict microvascular obstruction in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
IMRangio is a promising, pressure-wire-free tool that accurately correlates with invasive IMR and predicts microvascular obstruction in STEMI patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May offer wire-free microcirculatory assessment in STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Immediate assessment of coronary microcirculation during treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may facilitate patient stratification for targeted treatment algorithms. Use of pressure-wire to measure the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is possible but has inevitable practical restrictions. We aimed to develop and validate angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR angio ) as a novel and pressure-wire-free index to facilitate assessment of the coronary microcirculation. 45 STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were enrolled. Immediately before stenting and at completion of pPCI, IMR was measured within the infarct related artery (IRA). At the same time points, 2 angiographic views were acquired during hyperaemia to measure quantitative flow ratio (QFR) from which IMR angio was derived. In a subset of 15 patients both IMR and IMR angio were also measured in the non-IRA. Patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 48 h for assessment of microvascular obstruction (MVO). IMR angio and IMR were significantly correlated (ρ: 0.85, p < 0.001). Both IMR and IMR angio were higher in the IRA rather than in the non-IRA (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006, respectively) and were higher in patients with evidence of clinically significant MVO (> 1.55% of left ventricular mass) (p = 0.03 and p = 0.005, respectively). Post-pPCI IMR angio presented and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (CI95% 0.92–1.00, p < 0.001) for prediction of post-pPCI IMR > 40U and of 0.81 (CI95% 0.65–0.97, p < 0.001) for MVO > 1.55%. IMR angio is a promising tool for the assessment of coronary microcirculation. Assessment of IMR without the use of a pressure-wire may enable more rapid, convenient and cost-effective assessment of coronary microvascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria et al. (2020) conducted an observational in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=45). Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) vs. Invasive index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance of post-pPCI IMRangio for predicting post-pPCI IMR > 40U (AUC 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00, p=<0.001). Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) accurately predicted invasive IMR > 40U with an area under the curve of 0.96, offering a pressure-wire-free alternative for assessing coronary microcirculation in STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: