Key result
Relaxin agonists offer mechanistic promise in acute heart failure, though trial evidence remains mixed.
Why the study?
Do relaxin agonists improve outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
Do relaxin agonists improve outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
Relaxin agonists show preclinical promise for acute heart failure, but mixed clinical trial results highlight the need for biomarker-guided patient selection.
INTRODUCTION: Acute failure is a critical condition, encompassed by the sudden or progressive onset of symptoms or signs of congestion. The treatment strategies available are mainly supportive and do not improve mortality or long-term outcomes. Therefore, there is a need for alternative novel treatment strategies. In this narrative review, we explore the role of relaxin agonist as a potential therapeutic strategy in acute heart failure. AREAS COVERED: We aim to provide an overview of the evidence of preclinical and clinical studies on relaxin as a treatment strategy for acute heart failure. Papers collected in this review are from original research and systematic reviews which have been filtered following Medline and Cochrane Library searches. EXPERT OPINION: Relaxin has shown great potential in both preclinical and clinical studies due to its antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and vasodilatory effect on the heart. However, there has been mixed evidence from clinical trials involving relaxin which could be due to patient groups, investigation sites, trial design, and chance. Further studies should focus on developing biomarkers to identify specific population groups who are most likely to benefit from relaxin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajay et al. (2024) conducted a review in Acute heart failure. Relaxin agonists was evaluated. Relaxin agonists show potential for treating acute heart failure due to antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and vasodilatory effects, though clinical trial evidence remains mixed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: