Key result
The electrocardiography (EKG) method is a valid, safe, and cost-effective alternative to standard radiological control for confirming the tip position of central venous access devices.
Why the study?
Is the intra-procedural EKG method a valid and cost-effective alternative to standard radiological control for positioning central venous catheters?
Population
Patients requiring central venous access device insertion, including peripherally inserted central catheters
Comparison
Intra-procedural electrocardiography method for… vs Standard radiological control
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support EKG for CVC tip confirmation in select cases; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
Is the intra-procedural EKG method a valid and cost-effective alternative to standard radiological control for positioning central venous catheters?
The intra-procedural EKG method is a practical, safe, and cost-effective alternative to fluoroscopy or chest x-ray for confirming central venous catheter tip position.
Pittiruti et al. (2011) conducted a review in Central venous catheter insertion. Electrocardiography (EKG) method vs. Fluoroscopy or post-procedural chest x-ray was evaluated. The electrocardiography (EKG) method is a valid, safe, and cost-effective alternative to standard radiological control for confirming the tip position of central venous access devices.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: