Why the study?
The prognostic impact of platelet distribution width, a specific marker of platelet activation, was unclear in patients with heart failure.
Does high platelet distribution width predict adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure?
Does high platelet distribution width predict adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure?
High platelet distribution width (≥ 16.9 fL) is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis, including all-cause and cardiac death, in patients with heart failure.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of platelet distribution width (PDW), which is a specific marker of platelet activation, has been unclear in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective observational study enrolling 1,746 hospitalized patients with HF. Patients were divided into tertiles based on levels of PDW: 1st (PDW < 15.9 fL, n = 586), 2nd (PDW 15.9-16.8 fL, n = 617), and 3rd (PDW ≥ 16.9, n = 543) tertiles. We compared baseline patients' characteristics and post-discharge prognosis: all-cause death; cardiac death; and cardiac events. The 3rd tertile showed the highest age and levels of B-type natriuretic peptide compared to other tertiles (1st, 2nd, and 3rd tertiles; age, 69.0, 68.0, and 70.0 years old, P = 0.038; B-type natriuretic peptide, 235.2, 171.9, and 241.0 pg/mL, P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was equivalent among the tertiles. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, rates of all endpoints were the highest in the 3rd tertile (log-rank P < 0.001, respectively). The Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the 3rd tertile was associated with adverse prognosis (all-cause death, hazard ratio [HR] 1.716, P < 0.001; cardiac death, HR 1.919, P < 0.001; cardiac event, HR 1.401, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High PDW is a novel predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: