Why the study?
The precise pathophysiology of preeclampsia remains unclear and diagnosis occurs only when clinically visible, prompting research into biomolecules with predictive, diagnostic, prognostic, or mechanistic roles.
Do ESM-1 and GBP-1 serve as biomarkers or play a role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia?
Do ESM-1 and GBP-1 serve as biomarkers or play a role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia?
ESM-1 and GBP-1 are proposed as potential biomarkers and key pathophysiological players in preeclampsia-associated endothelial dysfunction.
Preeclampsia pathophysiology remains incompletely defined; leaves open targeted therapies until mechanistic clarity emerges.
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and is one of the most prevalent causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The disease is thought to originate from impaired placental development or restricted villous perfusion, villous constraints and placental senescence at the end of pregnancy, which in turn cause defective placental functioning and eventually systemic endothelial dysfunction. Because the precise pathophysiology of this pregnancy complication is still not clear and diagnosis is only made when it is clinically visible, considerable research is being performed on biomolecules that could play a role in the development of the disease and could have a predictive, diagnostic or prognostic value. In the present review, we focus on two proteins, associated with endothelial dysfunction, which have changed levels in pregnant women during preeclampsia. These two proteins, endothelial specific molecule-1 (ESM-1) and guanylate binding protein-1 (GBP-1), are known to be involved in processes such as angiogenesis, inflammation and endothelial activation. ESM-1 is increased during preeclampsia and GBP-1 is decreased during preeclampsia, and their potential as biomarkers for preeclampsia could therefore be assessed. In addition to assessing their potential to serve as biomarkers, we will go into potential pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia in which these proteins might be involved. We are proposing that ESM-1 and GBP-1 might play a role in impaired angiogenesis and vascular maladaptation, impaired immune regulation and oxidative stress, which ultimately could lead to endothelial dysfunction and preeclampsia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuitemaker et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: