Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 7, 2001BMJOpen Access

Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Peter Jüni
Peter JüniUniversity of Toronto

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Peter Jüni (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cb3cd178e986690cf868ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.1997 · 131 citations
  2. 2Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials2001 · 1,042 citations
  3. 3A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.1986 · 199 citations
  4. 4Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.1999 · 368 citations
  5. 5Randomisation.1991 · 173 citations