Why the study?
Does morning onset of acute myocardial infarction increase the risk of recurrent ACS and MACE in patients undergoing primary PCI?
Does morning onset of acute myocardial infarction increase the risk of recurrent ACS and MACE in patients undergoing primary PCI?
Morning onset of acute myocardial infarction is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent ACS, MACE, and progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared to other times of onset.
May inform post-PCI risk stratification by AMI onset time; leaves open whether circadian patterns warrant targeted secondary prevention trials.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between time of onset of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and long-term clinical outcome has not been completely understood. We hypothesized that morning onset acute MI may be associated with adverse cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study involved 663 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The main outcome measures were cardiac death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and re-hospitalization for heart failure. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite of individual adverse outcomes. Morning onset acute MI occurred in 212 patients (32.0%); they had higher rates of recurrent ACS (13% vs. 8%, P=0.03) and MACE (21% vs. 14%, P=0.012) than the patients with other times of onset. The PCI rate for progressive lesions was also higher than for patients with other times of onset (23% vs. 14%, P=0.013). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, morning onset was an independent predictor of recurrent ACS, MACE, and PCI for progressive lesions, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.06-2.92, P=0.030), 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02-2.23, P=0.038), and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.03-2.42, P=0.037), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Morning onset may be associated with increased risk of recurrent ACS and coronary atherosclerosis progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakashima et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: