Why the study?
Traditional assessment of the lactate threshold requires invasive blood sampling and specialized meters, prompting the need to validate a newly developed noninvasive device.
Does a noninvasive lactate threshold device accurately determine lactate threshold heart rate compared to traditional blood lactate methods?
Does a noninvasive lactate threshold device accurately determine lactate threshold heart rate compared to traditional blood lactate methods?
A novel noninvasive device can accurately estimate lactate threshold heart rate without the need for traditional blood sampling.
Supports noninvasive LTHR estimation without blood sampling; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
The lactate threshold is considered a key marker of endurance exercise performance and identification of this threshold is important in writing an exercise training program. Unfortunately, assessment of the lactate threshold has traditionally required venous or capillary blood samples and a specialized meter to assess blood lactate concentrations. Recently, a consumer grade, non-invasive device was developed to determine muscle oxygenation and estimate the lactate threshold. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of a noninvasive lactate threshold device (NID) to determine lactate threshold heart rate (LTHR). METHODS: ) completed a personalized graded exercise test on a treadmill. All participants wore the NID and blood lactate samples were taken at the end of 3-minute stages. LTHR was then calculated using two traditional methods (4 mmol/L and >1 mmol/L increase) and compared against the same heart rate values calculated by the NID. RESULTS: No significant differences (p = .87) were found in LTHR between the NID and the traditional lactate methods (NID: 167 ± 9 bpm, 4 mmol/L: 167 ± 12 bpm, >1 mmol/L: 167 ± 12 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary support for the validity of the NID for estimation of LTHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMorries et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: