Why the study?
Emerging data suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors may cause immune-related adverse cardiovascular events, including accelerated atherosclerosis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, beyond myocarditis.
Are immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in cancer patients?
Are immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in cancer patients?
This review highlights emerging preclinical and clinical data suggesting an association between immune checkpoint inhibitors and accelerated atherosclerosis, emphasizing the need for cardiovascular prevention strategies in cancer patients.
In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly changed the field of oncology, emerging as first-line treatment, either alone or in combination with other regimens, for numerous malignancies, improving overall survival and progression-free survival in these patients. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors might also cause severe or fatal immune-related adverse events, including adverse cardiovascular events. Initially, myocarditis was recognized as the main immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiac event, but our knowledge of other potential immune-related cardiovascular adverse events continues to broaden. Recently, preclinical and clinical data seem to support an association between immune checkpoint inhibitors and accelerated atherosclerosis as well as atherosclerotic cardiovascular events such as cardiac ischemic disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. In this review, by offering a comprehensive overview of the pivotal role of inflammation in atherosclerosis, we focus on the potential molecular pathways underlying the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, we provide an overview of therapeutic strategies for cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy to prevent the development of cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piras et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: