Why the study?
It was hypothesized that immunological and genomic profiles significantly differ between primary and secondary angiosarcoma, potentially impacting treatment strategies and immunotherapy.
Do immunological and genomic profiles differ between primary and secondary angiosarcomas?
Do immunological and genomic profiles differ between primary and secondary angiosarcomas?
Secondary angiosarcomas exhibit significantly higher T-cell infiltration and more frequent DNA damage response gene mutations compared to primary angiosarcomas, suggesting a potential role for immunotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distinct immune profiles in primary versus secondary angiosarcoma may guide treatment; leaves open immunotherapy efficacy pending validation.
Angiosarcomas (AS) are extremely rare and aggressive vascular malignancies subdivided in de novo primary AS (pAS) and secondary AS (sAS). We hypothesize that the combination of immunological and genomic profiles significantly differs between primary and secondary AS, with potential impact on treatment strategies and a role for immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed using multiplex immunohistochemistry from 79 pAS and 178 sAS. Median cell density was significantly higher in sAS for CD3+ T-cells (p < 0.001), CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells (p = 0.033), CD4+ T-helper cells (p < 0.001) and FoxP3+ T-regulatory cells (p < 0.001). CD20+ B-cell density was comparable (p = 0.417). Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in 25 pAS and 25 sAS. A (likely) pathogenic mutation was detected in 80% of pAS vs. 88% of sAS (p = 0.702). Amplifications were found in 15% of pAS vs. 84% of sAS (p < 0.001). DNA damage response (DDR) pathway mutations (p = 0.021) and MYC amplifications (p < 0.001) were predominantly seen in sAS. In conclusion we observed a clear and clinical relevant distinction in immune infiltration and genomic profiles between pAS and sAS. The T-cell infiltrated tumor microenvironment and frequent DDR gene mutations, especially in sAS, warrant clinical trials with immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravensteijn et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: