Why the study?
Does cardiogenic shock alter the blood flow ratio of the IVC to total venous return compared to hemorrhagic shock in dogs?
Does cardiogenic shock alter the blood flow ratio of the IVC to total venous return compared to hemorrhagic shock in dogs?
In dogs, the blood flow ratio of the IVC to total venous return decreases in hemorrhagic shock but remains unchanged in cardiogenic shock, likely due to stretch receptor activation in the low-pressure system inhibiting sympathetic nerve activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not inform human shock management; leaves open differential IVC-to-CO mechanisms in cardiogenic versus hemorrhagic shock.
Blood flow of the superior (SVC) and inferior venae cavae (IVC) was simultaneously and separately measured with two cannulating type electromagnetic blood flow probes inserted into the SVC and IVC of thirty two dogs during hypotensive and low cardiac output states in hemorrhagic shock and cardiogenic shock. Blood flow ratio of teh IVC to total venous return was expressed by IVCF/CO (per cent). It was 66.3 per cent in normal condition, but was decreased to 54.3 per cent in hemorrhagic shock. In four cardiogenic shock models, however, IVCF/CO changes little from the control to the initial phase of shock state. At least in part, the marked decrease of venous return from the IVC region in hemorrhagic shock was considered due to the increase of sympathetic nerve activity in that region mediated by baro-receptors in the high pressure system. The unchanged blood flow ratio of the SVC and IVC in cardiogenic shock was assumed that the high atrial or high ventricular endodiastolic pressure was an inhibitory factor of the sympathetic nerve activity by activating the stretch receptors existing the low pressure system including left ventricle. This hypothesis was proved by the experiments in which the renal vascular resistance was suppressed by stretch of the left atrium by either extraatrial mechanical traction or intraatrial balloon inflation in hemorrhagic shock or intracardiac decompression during cardiopulmonary by pass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ijima et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: