Why the study?
Does high intensity focused ultrasound ablation maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does high intensity focused ultrasound ablation maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation?
High intensity focused ultrasound ablation is effective for maintaining long-term sinus rhythm in paroxysmal AF, but alternative strategies should be considered for persistent and long-standing persistent AF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support HIFU ablation in paroxysmal AF; leaves open long-term efficacy in persistent forms pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Epicor high intensity focused ultrasound (St. Jude, Inc.®, Minneapolis, MN, USA) system using seven-day ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring over a two-year follow-up period. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients undergoing ablation were included from a single center between January 2006 and December 2009. Rhythm was assessed using seven-day ambulatory ECG or permanent pacemaker interrogation. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up, seven through death. Results were reported according to atrial fibrillation (AF) class preoperatively: paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent (LSP). RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of patients remained in sinus rhythm at greater than two years. The percentage of patients in sinus rhythm according to preoperative AF class were 81% (paroxysmal AF), 56% (persistent AF), and 18% (long-standing AF). The class of AF prior to surgery, left atrium size, and body mass index determined the long-term outcome. There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that high intensity focused ultrasound ablation for atrial fibrillation using the Epicor system is safe and effective for surgical patients with paroxysmal AF. The persistent and LSP AF results suggest that alternative ablation strategies should be considered for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: