Why the study?
Inflammation plays a central role in MI and subsequent cardiac remodeling, motivating assessment of the long-term effects of MTX on ventricular function and major cardiovascular events in STEMI patients.
Does methotrexate improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Does methotrexate improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Long-term follow-up of the TETHYS trial demonstrates that methotrexate does not improve cardiovascular outcomes or LVEF trajectory in STEMI patients and is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to placebo.
MTX effects on post-STEMI remodeling remain uncertain; leaves open clinical utility pending randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Inflammation plays a central role in myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent cardiac remodeling. The TETHYS study assessed the long-term effects of methotrexate (MTX) in ST-segment elevation MI patients, focusing on ventricular function and major cardiovascular events. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational follow-up study of 81 patients from the TETHYS trial, randomized to receive either MTX or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of MTX on cardiovascular outcomes using a win ratio (WR) approach, including death, reinfarction, stroke, rehospitalization, and the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 5 years. The secondary objective was to assess LVEF improvement after 180 days. A WR analysis was performed to assess cardiovascular outcomes. LVEF changes over time were analyzed using ANCOVA for repeated measures. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: MTX treatment resulted in significantly fewer wins in the WR analysis compared to placebo (WR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93, p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in LVEF trajectory over time (p = 0.308). However, MTX showed a significant improvement in LVEF when comparing 180 days to 3 months: 0.009% (MTX) versus -0.105% (placebo), p = 0.020. CONCLUSIONS: MTX did not improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and was associated with more adverse events compared to placebo. No significant differences were found in LVEF trajectory over time. A transient improvement in LVEF was observed at 180 days but did not translate to better long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raimundo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: