Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are efficacious for weight management; however, there are barriers that prevent access. Although studies have shown the efficacy of individual treatments, there is a lack of evidence that compares different classes of weight management medications with each other. Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of GLP-1 agonists with other classes of weight management medications. Methods This retrospective chart review included patients prescribed a weight management medication by a primary care pharmacist at Corewell Health between June 1, 2022, and June 1, 2023. Patients were assigned to (1) the GLP-1 agonist group or (2) the non-GLP-1 agonist group. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 5% weight loss at the end of the treatment course. The secondary outcomes include the percentage of patients who reached ≥ 10% weight loss and ≥ 15% weight loss at the end of the treatment course and average change in body mass index (BMI) at the end of the treatment course. Results A higher number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group achieved the primary end point of ≥ 5% weight loss compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group (29 patients [50.9%] vs. 17 patients [30.9%], P = 0.0318). A logistic model was done, which showed that, when accounting for medication duration, the number of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group who reached the primary end point was not statistically significant compared with the non-GLP-1 agonist group with a P value of 0.0772. There was not a statistically significant difference in the number of patients who achieved ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% weight loss between groups, whereas BMI change was statistically significantly greater in the GLP-1 agonist group. Conclusion A higher percentage of patients in the GLP-1 agonist group reached ≥ 5% weight loss as compared to patients in the non-GLP-1 agonist group, without regard to medication duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: