Why the study?
Data are limited on the usefulness of 3D-STE in predicting prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful revascularization by primary PCI.
Do three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) parameters predict MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary PCI?
Do three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) parameters predict MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary PCI?
3D speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters, particularly global area strain and global circumferential strain, are independent predictors of 1-year MACE in patients with AMI after primary PCI.
3D-STE may aid post-AMI risk stratification; leaves open whether parameters improve decisions beyond standard measures.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) allows simultaneous assessment of multidirectional components of strain. However, there are few data on its usefulness to predict prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the prognostic value of four different 3D-STE parameters (global longitudinal strain (GLS-3D), global circumferential strain (GCS-3D), global radial strain (GRS-3D), and global area strain (GAS)) in AMI, after successful revascularization by primary PCI. METHODS: We enrolled 94 AMI patients (66 ± 13 years, 56% men) who underwent coronary angiography. All patients had been 3D-STE assessed and followed-up for 1 year for the occurrence of MACE. RESULTS: = 0.009) showed moderate accuracy in MACE prediction. Multivariate regression showed that GAS (HR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16), GLS-3D (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26), and GCS-3D (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23) remained independent predictors of MACE (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14 for GAS, and HR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2 for GCS-3D). However, post hoc power analysis indicated adequate sample size (power of 80%) only for GAS and GCS-3D for the ROC curve analysis and for GAS, GCS-3D, and GRS-3D for the log-rank test. CONCLUSION: Patients with AMI might benefit from early risk stratification with the aid of 3D-STE measurements, particularly GAS and GCS-3D, but larger studies are necessary to determine the optimal cut-off values to predict MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomoaia et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: