Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is well known that Thorstein Veblen accused the turn-of-the-century captains of industry of sabotage. What is not so well known is that, for Veblen, sabotage was not simply a pejorative term. By sabotage, he meant a conscientious withdrawal of [Veblen 1990a, 38]. But efficiency, as both Veblen and a number of the engineers of his time used the term, was not the now-standard microeconomic efficiency represented by the minimum point on a U-shaped long-run average total cost curve. Veblen espoused a technical, rather than a cost-based, definition of efficiency. The difference between these two views of efficiency can best be understood by focusing on some of the early engineers-in particular the early Tayloritesfrom whom Veblen borrowed heavily and who were in turn influenced greatly by Veblen in their own thinking about efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janet T. Knoedler (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: