Why the study?
Clopidogrel efficacy is often attenuated in renal impairment and HPR independently correlates with adverse events, prompting a quantitative evaluation of HPR prevalence and impact in CKD.
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease treated with clopidogrel?
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease treated with clopidogrel?
High on-treatment platelet reactivity is more prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and is significantly associated with increased risks of MACE, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.
CKD patients on clopidogrel show higher HPR prevalence linked to increased MACE; leaves open whether testing or alternatives improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of clopidogrel is often attenuated in the setting of renal impairment. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is an independent correlate of adverse event. Here we performed a quantitative evaluation of the prevalence and impact of HPR in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from their inception to 1 March 2018 for cohort studies assessing the risk ratio (RR) of prevalence of HPR in CKD versus non-CKD patients and association of cardiovascular outcome with HPR in CKD patients treated with clopidogrel. Outcome measures included major adverse cardiac event, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as estimates of effect size in random-effect models. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising a total of 3028 CKD patients and 11138 non-CKD patients were included in the evaluation. Compared to patients with normal renal function, patients with CKD had a significantly higher risk of HPR (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23-1.46). In CKD patients, HPR was associated with increased risk of MACE (RR 2.99, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.53; p < 0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR1.74, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.33; p = 0.0002), and stent thrombosis (RR 2.98, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.26; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Based on pooled analysis, CKD appeared correlated with HPR and this association had prognostic significance. Further studies with standardised laboratory methods and specifically defined protocols are required to validate the clinical relevance of such response variability to clopidogrel in CKD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: