Why the study?
Despite the known benefits of cognitive aids, individuals often do not use them consistently, prompting investigation into whether the presence of and orientation to SPA CECs improve trainee performance during simulated critical events.
Does the availability of Critical Event Checklists improve the performance of trainees in simulated operating room emergencies?
Does the availability of Critical Event Checklists improve the performance of trainees in simulated operating room emergencies?
The availability of Critical Event Checklists enhances the performance of trainees in simulated operating room critical events, despite poor overall uptake.
Low checklist uptake limits benefits in simulations; confirms performance gains when used, supporting strategies to boost adoption.
Introduction Crises in the operating theatre during a paediatric case are rare with the incidence of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in non-cardiac patients being 1.4/10,000. In order to address this, the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA) developed cognitive aids (CAs) in the form of Critical Event Checklists (SPA CECs). Several studies have demonstrated the benefit of CAs in improving performance of critical tasks. Despite the presence of CAs, individuals often do not use the aids consistently. The objective of our study was to investigate whether the presence of SPA CECs, and orientation to these tools, improve the performance of trainees during simulated critical events. Methods With local Research Ethics Board (REB) approval we used a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial design. The first randomization was the participant orientation to the SPA CECs (e-module vs. didactic). The second randomization assigned participants to complete the simulations with or without SPA CECs available. The simulations were videoed and rated by two raters using a scenario-specific checklist and global rating scale (GRS). Results We conducted 78 simulations. The SPA CEC was used in 17.9% of scenarios. The SPA CEC was used in 44.8% of diagnosis-based scenarios and only 2.0% of generic problem-based scenarios. Participants' performance was superior with the SPA CEC present (GRS mean 3 [SD 1.27]) than without the SPA CEC available (GRS mean 2.43 [SD 0.89]) (p = 0.048). Conclusion Overall, we showed that uptake of the SPA CECs is poor. We also demonstrated that when the SPA CECs are utilized, they enhance the performance of trainees in simulated operating room (OR) critical events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqui et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: