Why the study?
The feasibility and safety of using a lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation in humans remain largely unknown.
Is ventricular arrhythmia ablation using a dual-energy lattice-tip catheter safe and effective in patients with ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular complexes, or ventricular fibrillation?
Is ventricular arrhythmia ablation using a dual-energy lattice-tip catheter safe and effective in patients with ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular complexes, or ventricular fibrillation?
This first multicenter European registry demonstrates that ventricular arrhythmia ablation using a dual-energy (PFA/RF) lattice-tip catheter in a complex, largely redo population is feasible with an 84% acute success rate, 72% short-term arrhythmia-free survival, and a 6% major acute complication rate comparable to conventional RF ablation.
Registry data suggest lattice-tip VA ablation feasible; leaves open need for randomized safety and efficacy trials.
AIMS: The feasibility and safety of the lattice-tip catheter for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in humans remain largely unknown. This study aimed to assess feasibility, safety profile as well as patient outcomes after VA ablation with a lattice-tip catheter in a multicentre European registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 18 European centres using the AFFERA system in September 2024 agreed to participate. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data (minimum 3 months) were systematically collected and analysed. A total of 126 patients (18% female; mean age 59 ± 16 years) underwent VA ablation using the lattice-tip catheter during the inclusion period. Ablation indications included ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 99, premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in 23, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 4 patients. Major and minor acute complications were observed in 7 (6%) and 18 (14%) procedures, respectively. They included thrombo-embolic event (n = 2), major bleeding (n = 2), ventricular fibrillation induction (n = 1), tamponade due to epicardial access (n = 1), and cardiogenic shock due to prolonged VT mapping (n = 1). Within the first month post-procedure, three patients died [from multi-organ failure (n = 2) and sepsis (n = 1)], two had worsening heart failure, one myocardial infarction, one sepsis, and one major gastro-intestinal bleeding. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 ± 3.7 months, absence of recurrence was 78% for PVC, 70% for VT, and 100% for VF. CONCLUSION: In this complex population with refractory VA, ablation using the lattice-tip catheter appears feasible and relatively safe. In the absence of large, randomized trials, exhaustive registry is of key importance to ensure safety and efficacy of new catheter technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sacher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: