Why the study?
Does sequential PCI and radiofrequency catheter ablation safely suppress PVCs in a patient with LV summit arrhythmia and adjacent critical coronary artery stenosis?
Does sequential PCI and radiofrequency catheter ablation safely suppress PVCs in a patient with LV summit arrhythmia and adjacent critical coronary artery stenosis?
In a patient with LV summit PVCs and adjacent critical coronary stenosis, performing PCI prior to RF ablation in the great cardiac vein safely suppressed the arrhythmia without coronary complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case of LV summit PVC ablation feasible in symptomatic patient; leaves open optimal mapping and long-term outcomes in larger cohorts.
The left ventricular (LV) summit is the usual source of epicardial idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). A 56-year-old male patient presented to the cardiology outpatient clinic with palpitations and dyspnea. Twelve-lead electrocardiography performed on admission revealed monomorphic PVCs with precordial QRS transition in the V1 derivation and an rS pattern in the D1 derivation and inferior axis. An electrophysiology study and ablation procedure were planned. Activation mapping guided by a three-dimensional electroanatomic system was conducted to identify the earliest site of ventricular activation of the PVCs. During the PVCs, the earliest ventricular activation was observed within the great cardiac vein (GCV) and preceded the QRS onset by 37 ms. Coronary angiography was performed before ablation in the coronary venous system (CVS) to assess the distance from the coronary artery, which showed severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery. Then, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed to address the left circumflex artery stenosis. Anatomic catheter ablation was performed in the aortic cusp and endocardial LV outflow tract, the sites adjacent to the LV-summit PVC origin. However, successful ablation could not be achieved. Subsequently, an irrigated radiofrequency current was delivered in the GCV for 60 seconds, with the power being gradually increased to 30 W and with an irrigation flow rate of 30 mL/min. After ablation, under isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing from the right ventricle, no PVC or ventricular tachycardia was observed. Special precautions should be taken to avoid coronary artery damage during ablation from distal CVS. This approach may increase the success of ablation and avoid potential complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gökhan Aksan (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: