This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/Objectives: The glymphatic system plays a crucial role in clearing brain metabolic waste, and its dysfunction has been correlated to various neurological disorders. The Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis Along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) index has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of glymphatic function by measuring diffusivity along perivascular spaces; however, its sensitivity to sleep-related changes in glymphatic activity has not yet been validated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the DTI-ALPS index as a quantitative marker of dynamic glymphatic activity during sleep. Methods: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were obtained from 12 healthy male participants (age = 24.44 ± 2.5 years; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) < 5), once while awake and 16 times during sleep, following 24 h sleep deprivation and administration of 10 mg zolpidem. Simultaneous MR-compatible electroencephalography was used to determine whether the subject was asleep or awake. DTI preprocessing included eddy current correction and tensor fitting. The DTI-ALPS index was calculated from nine regions of interest in projection and association areas aligned to standard space. The final analysis included nine participants (age = 24.56 ± 2.74 years; PSQI < 5) who maintained a continuous sleep state for 1 h without awakening. Results: Among nine ROI pairs, three showed significant increases in the DTI-ALPS index during sleep compared to wakefulness (Friedman test; p = 0.027, 0.029, 0.034). These ROIs showed changes at 14, 19, and 25 min after sleep induction, with FDR-corrected p-values of 0.024, 0.018, and 0.018, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the DTI-ALPS index within 30 min after sleep induction through time-series DTI analysis during wakefulness and sleep, supporting its potential as a biomarker reflecting glymphatic activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: