Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals glymphatic dysfunction in sleep disorders, highlighting shared neural features.
Background Sleep disorders are increasingly linked to glymphatic dysfunction, but whether this impairment is universal across different sleep pathologies remains unclear. Objective This meta-analysis examined whether glymphatic dysfunction, assessed via the diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index, may represent a shared neural feature across a spectrum of sleep disorders. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2025, for observational studies comparing DTI-ALPS index between patients with sleep disorders and healthy controls. Data were synthesized from 19 studies (n = 2,315) using a random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs). Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessment were performed. Results The pooled analysis revealed significant global glymphatic impairment in patients with sleep disorders (SMD = −1.60, 95% CI [−2.65, −0.54], p = 0.003), indicating global glymphatic dysfunction. However, heterogeneity was extremely high (I 2 = 94.7%). Disorder-specific analyses showed pronounced deficits in obstructive sleep apnea (SMD = −0.92, p < 0.001) and idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (SMD = −0.63, p = 0.004), as well as in PSQI-defined poor sleep (SMD = −0.50, p < 0.001). Results for insomnia and narcolepsy were non-significant and highly heterogeneous. Meta-regression identified no significant moderators; publication bias was detected ( p = 0.01). Conclusion Glymphatic dysfunction, as assessed by DTI-ALPS, is consistently observed across several sleep disorders, suggesting a potential shared pathway. However, extreme heterogeneity limits interpretability of the pooled effect, and cross-sectional data preclude causal inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: