Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement. Objective: This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study ( n = 185) across the United States, evaluating experiences and preferences reported with an at-home self-collection device compared with clinician-collected screening using a speculum. The device is designed specifically for at-home self-collection and optimized for performance and usability, where collected samples are tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Roche cobas HPV test. In an earlier report, self-collected samples using this device showed high agreement for hrHPV detection when compared with clinician-collection with a speculum and cervical brush. Study Design: Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys. Results: Significantly more participants reported pain ( p < 0.001), discomfort ( p < 0.001), embarrassment ( p < 0.001), and nervousness ( p < 0.001) during clinician-collection compared with self-collection. In contrast, being at-ease ( p < 0.001) and in-control ( p < 0.001) were reported significantly more during self-collection. Similar patterns held across demographic groups relevant to CC screening engagement and related risk (i.e., sexual orientation, menopause status, income, and prior HPV diagnosis). Almost all (94% [156/166]) felt confident using the at-home self-collection device if they knew the results would be equivalent to clinician-collection. The device demonstrated wide usability, with 96% (163/170) successfully self-collecting using only the device’s provided instructions. Conclusion: By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crane et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: