Why the study?
The study aimed to examine the presence of subclinical cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in children with well-regulated type 1 diabetes using baroreceptor sensitivity, QT variability index, and heart rate variability.
Does well-regulated type 1 diabetes and BMI affect cardiac autonomic markers in children compared to healthy controls?
Does well-regulated type 1 diabetes and BMI affect cardiac autonomic markers in children compared to healthy controls?
Children with well-regulated type 1 diabetes do not show manifest signs of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, though concurrent overweight may increase susceptibility to early autonomic dysfunction.
Aims/hypothesis Our aim was to examine the presence of subclinical cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in a cohort of children with well-regulated type 1 diabetes by measuring baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS), QT variability index (QTVI) and heart rate variability (HRV). Methods Forty-five children (aged 6–15.99 years) with a type 1 diabetes duration of ≥5 years, and 37 healthy control children were included at baseline; and 28 and 18 children, respectively, were included at 2 year follow-up. Cardiac BRS, QTVI and HRV were measured and anthropometrical data and blood samples were collected from all study participants. Longitudinal HbA 1c values from 3 months after type 1 diabetes diagnosis and continuous glucose monitoring data from the children with type 1 diabetes were also collected. Results Time in normoglycaemia (TING) increased significantly from 42% to 48% between baseline and 2 year follow-up ( p =0.042). No difference in BRS, QTVI or HRV were found between the study groups at baseline or follow-up. Children with type 1 diabetes with a BMI z score ≥1 showed higher QTVI compared with either lean children with diabetes or healthy control children. QTVI correlated with type 1 diabetes duration, longitudinal HbA 1c AUC and cystatin C in children with type 1 diabetes at baseline, and with CV at follow-up. ( r =−0.447 p =0.004, r =−0.376 p =0.017, r =−323 p =0.048, and r =0.568 p =0.01, respectively). There was also a correlation between the increase in TING between the study visits and BRS at follow-up in children with type 1 diabetes ( r =0.524 p =0.031). Conclusions/interpretation In this well-regulated type 1 diabetes cohort we did not find manifest signs of CAN in children with type 1 diabetes. These are promising findings and should motivate further to keep striving for normoglycaemia in paediatric diabetes care. Children with both type 1 diabetes and overweight seem more susceptible to early development of CAN and might benefit from earlier and more intensive preventive targeting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergdahl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: