Why the study?
Does acarbose improve carotid plaque echolucency in patients with acute coronary syndromes and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does acarbose improve carotid plaque echolucency in patients with acute coronary syndromes and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Early initiation of acarbose in patients with acute coronary syndromes and type 2 diabetes rapidly improves carotid plaque echolucency and reduces inflammation within 1 month.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports early acarbose for carotid plaque stabilization in ACS with T2DM; extends evidence for its vascular effects beyond glycemia.
BACKGROUND: The resolution of hyperglycemia is associated with suppression of in-hospital cardiac complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This study evaluated carotid artery plaque echolucency using ultrasound in patients with ACS and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) to determine whether acarbose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor, may rapidly stabilize unstable atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS AND RESULTS: ACS patients with type 2 DM and carotid plaques (n=44) were randomly assigned to treatment with acarbose (150 or 300 mg/day, n=22) or a control group (no acarbose, n=22). Acarbose treatment was initiated within 5 days after the onset of ACS. Unstable carotid plaques were assessed by measuring plaque echolucency using carotid ultrasound with integrated backscatter (IBS) before, and at 2 weeks, 1 and 6 months after the initiation of treatment. An increase in the IBS value reflected an increase in carotid plaque echogenicity. As results, the IBS value of echolucent carotid plaques showed a significant increase at 1 month and a further increase at 6 months after treatment in the acarbose group, but there was minimal change in the control group. The increase in IBS values was significantly correlated with a decrease in C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose rapidly improved carotid plaque echolucency within 1 month of therapy in patients with ACS and type 2 DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: