Why the study?
Do kinin B1 and B2 receptor gene variants influence the coronary risk associated with systolic hypertension in men?
Do kinin B1 and B2 receptor gene variants influence the coronary risk associated with systolic hypertension in men?
Common variations in the kinin B1 and B2 receptor genes significantly increase the prospective coronary risk associated with systolic hypertension.
Should not yet change hypertension management; hypothesis-generating for genotype-informed coronary risk stratification in men.
AIMS: The contribution of kinins to the beneficial effects of angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in cardiovascular risk reduction remains unclear. The genes for the kinin inducible B1 receptor (B(1)R) and constitutive B2 receptor (B(2)R) contain functional variants: the B(1)R-699C (rather than G) and the B(2)R(-9) (rather than +9) alleles are associated with greater mRNA expression and the B(2)R(-9) allele with reduced left ventricular hypertrophic responses. We tested whether these gene variants influenced hypertensive coronary risk in a large prospective study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two thousand, seven hundred and six previously healthy UK men (mean age at recruitment 56 years; median follow-up 10.8 years) were genotyped for the kinin receptor variants. The coronary risk attributable to systolic hypertension (SBP>/=160 mmHg) was significantly higher only in B(1)R-699GG homozygotes (HR 2.14 [1.42-3.22]; P<0.0001) and B(2)R(+9,+9) individuals (HR 3.51 [1.69-7.28]; P=0.001) but not in B(1)R-699C allele carriers (HR 0.82 [0.28-2.42]; P=0.76) or in B(2)R(-9,-9) homozygotes (HR 1.25 [0.51-3.04]; P=0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Common variation in the genes for the kinin B(1)and B(2)receptors influences prospective hypertensive coronary risk. These are the first reported human data to suggest a role for the B(1)R in human coronary vascular disease, and the first prospective study to demonstrate a similar role for the B(2)R.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S Dhamrait (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: