Why the study?
Do intracardiac conduction intervals differ between normal children and patients with congenital heart disease?
Do intracardiac conduction intervals differ between normal children and patients with congenital heart disease?
Intracardiac conduction intervals are prolonged in specific patterns depending on the type of congenital heart defect and associated hemodynamic overload.
Suggests overload-specific conduction delays in pediatric congenital heart disease; extends prior observations but leaves open arrhythmia risk and management implications.
His bundle electrograms were recorded in 348 patients aged 2 months to 24 years following routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Among 41 children found to be free of anatomic or hemodynamic abnormality the following mean values were obtained: P-H interval, 93.4 +/- 15.3 msec; P-A time, 21.2 +/- 7.1 msec; A-H interval, 72.2 +/- 15.9 msec; and H-V interval, 39.8 +/- 5.2 msec. The remaining 307 patients were analyzed by diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The mean P-H interval was found to be significantly increased in both ostium primum and secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) with A-H prolongation in primum ASD and P-A prolongation in secundum ASD. The mean H-V interval was significantly prolonged in ostium primum ASD and in patients with severe aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency. and mitral regurgitation. Grouping of the patients physiologically revealed that patients with moderate-to-severe right ventricular volume overload had P-H prolongation, and patients with severe left ventricular volume or pressure overload had H-V prolongation. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levin et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: