Why the study?
Stent restenosis risk is high following acute stroke treatment of tandem lesions, requiring antiplatelet therapy to prevent restenosis while avoiding intracranial hemorrhage.
Does triple antiplatelet therapy improve stent patency and maintain safety in patients receiving tandem lesion treatment for acute stroke?
Does triple antiplatelet therapy improve stent patency and maintain safety in patients receiving tandem lesion treatment for acute stroke?
Triple antiplatelet therapy during tandem lesion treatment for acute stroke appears safe and is associated with a low rate of stent restenosis at 90 days.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Triple APT for tandem lesions was associated with low restenosis and favorable outcomes; leaves open optimal regimen in randomized trials.
Background Acute stroke treatment with intracranial thrombectomy and treatment of ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis/occlusion (“tandem lesion”, TL) in one session is considered safe. However, the risk of stent restenosis after TL treatment is high, and antiplatelet therapy (APT) preventing restenosis must be well balanced to avoid intracranial hemorrhage. We investigated the safety and 90-day outcome of patients receiving TL treatment under triple-APT, focused on stent-patency and possible disadvantageous comorbidities. Methods Patients receiving TL treatment in the setting of acute stroke between 2013 and 2022 were analyzed regarding peri-/postprocedural safety and stent patency after 90 days. All patients received intravenous eptifibatide and acetylsalicylic acid and one of the three drugs prasugrel, clopidogrel, or ticagrelor. Duplex imaging was performed 24h after treatment, at discharge and 90 days, and digital subtraction angiography was performed if restenosis was suspected. Results 176 patients were included. Periprocedural complications occurred in 2.3% of the patients at no periprocedural death, and in-hospital death in 13.6%. Discharge mRS score was maintained or improved at the 90-day follow-up in 86%, 4.54% had an in-stent restenosis requiring treatment at 90 days. No recorded comorbidity considered disadvantageous for stent patency showed statistical significance, the duration of the endovascular procedure had no significant effect on outcome. Conclusion TL treatment with triple APT resulted in a lower restenosis rate, comparable rates of sICH and mRS in comparison to single and dual APT. Aggressive APT in the initial phase may therefore prevent recurrent stroke better than restrained platelet inhibition. Comorbidities did not influence stent patency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanafer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: