Why the study?
Does transcatheter closure of secundum ASDs with deficient rims have similar safety and feasibility compared to closure in patients without deficient rims?
Does transcatheter closure of secundum ASDs with deficient rims have similar safety and feasibility compared to closure in patients without deficient rims?
Transcatheter closure of secundum ASDs with deficient rims is feasible and safe, with a high success rate and low long-term complication rate comparable to those without deficient rims, despite a transient increase in early postoperative arrhythmias.
Transient early arrhythmias warrant short-term monitoring in deficient-rim ASD closure; extends feasibility data but leaves open need for randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure procedures for the treatment of atrial septal defects (ASDs) with insufficient rims. METHODS: A total of 507 secondary ASDs were divided into two groups based on whether they had deficient rims or not (152 vs. 355 cases, respectively). Any complications, including residual shunt, heart arrhythmia, occluder translocation, etc., were followed up for 1-3 years. RESULTS: There were no differences in gender, weight, exposure time, ECG states, pulmonary pressure, the intervention success rate, occurrence of residual shunt, the operation time and occurrence of residual shunt during follow-up between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the occurrence of rhythm disorders was significantly different between the two groups; ASDs with deficient rims were at an elevated risk (p < 0.05). Specifically, there was a significantly higher incidence in the occurrence of arrhythmia in the deficient rims group at 24 h postoperation, but no differences in arrhythmia incidence at any of the other follow-up time points (1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with deficient rims experience a high success rate of ASD intervention and low rate of complications when the procedures are performed by experienced operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: