Why the study?
Does nesiritide improve cost effectiveness compared to milrinone or dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Does nesiritide improve cost effectiveness compared to milrinone or dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Nesiritide was associated with lower hospital and ICU length of stay and lower average cost per case compared to milrinone or dobutamine in acute decompensated heart failure.
Nesiritide was associated with shorter stays and lower costs; hypothesis-generating for cost-effectiveness versus inotropes in acute decompensated heart failure.
Despite recent advances in the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure, the cost of treatment for such patients remains considerable. IV diuretics, vasodilators, and positive inotropic agents are commonly prescribed. A retrospective data analysis was conducted to determine the cost effectiveness of nesiritide compared with milrinone and dobutamine administered in a hospital setting during episodes of acute decompensated heart failure. Nesiritide-treated patients demonstrated a significantly lower overall hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and average cost per case compared with dobutamine or milrinone. Although the acquisition cost of nesiritide was higher than that of milrinone and dobutamine, nesiritide was a more cost-effective treatment option for patients with acute decompensated heart failure in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scroggins et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: