Why the study?
While rTMS and MBSR show effects in depression, their combined effectiveness and application in post-stroke depression patients remained unclear.
Does active rTMS combined with MBSR improve depressive symptoms, cognitive function, ADL, and sleep quality in patients with post-stroke depression?
Does active rTMS combined with MBSR improve depressive symptoms, cognitive function, ADL, and sleep quality in patients with post-stroke depression?
The combination of rTMS and MBSR significantly improves depressive symptoms, cognitive function, activities of daily living, and sleep quality in patients with post-stroke depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combined rTMS-MBSR for post-stroke depression; extends evidence on non-pharmacologic rehabilitation interventions.
Background: Post-stroke depression (PSD) is most prevalent during the rehabilitative period following a stroke. Recent studies verified the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (rTMS) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in patients with depression. However, the effectiveness and prospect of application in PSD patients remain unclear. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined intervention based on rTMS and MBSR for the physical and mental state of PSD patients. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was employed. Participants were recruited from the Rehabilitation Medicine Centre and randomly assigned to receive either MBSR combined with active or sham rTMS or sham rTMS combined with general psychological care. We used a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), a mini-mental state examination (MMSE), the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to evaluate depressed symptoms, cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADL), and sleep quality at baseline, post-intervention, and the 8-week follow-up. A two-factor analysis of variance was used to compare differences between groups, and Pearson’s linear correlation was used to analyze the possible relationship between variables and potential predictors of depression improvement. Results: Seventy-two participants were randomized to rTMS−MBSR (n = 24), sham rTMS−MBSR (n = 24), or sham rTMS−general psychological care (n = 24). A total of 71 patients completed the questionnaire, a 99% response rate. There were significant time and group interaction effects in HAMD-17, MMSE, MBI, and PSQI scores (p < 0.001). The repeated-measure ANOVA showed a significant improvement of all variables in rTMS−MBSR compared to sham rTMS−MBSR and sham rTMS combined with general psychological care (p < 0.05). Additional results demonstrated that cognitive function, sleep quality, and activities of daily living are associated with depressive symptoms, and cognitive function is a potential variable for improved depression. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms can be identified early by assessing cognitive function, and rTMS−MBSR might be considered a potentially helpful treatment for PSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: