Why the study?
Ventricular dyssynchrony causes heart failure and cellular dysfunction affecting myocardial metabolism and mitochondrial activity, which are improved by CRT, warranting a review of these mechanisms to guide individualized therapy.
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy improve cellular metabolism and mitochondrial function in models of ventricular dyssynchrony?
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy improve cellular metabolism and mitochondrial function in models of ventricular dyssynchrony?
Cardiac resynchronization therapy extends beyond correcting electrical and structural remodeling by restoring optimal cellular metabolic homeostasis and mitochondrial function in dyssynchronous heart failure.
Dyssynchrony-induced cellular dysfunction may refine CRT selection; leaves open targeted metabolic trials in HF.
Ventricular dyssynchrony serves as a cause of heart failure, resulting from impaired electrical conduction within the heart, commonly from bundle branch block or right ventricular pacing. It exceeds structural remodelling to cause significant cellular dysfunction, particularly in aberrant myocardial metabolism, alterations to myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiency, along with compromised mitochondrial activity. CRT is a therapeutic strategy that is used for the dyssynchronous ventricle by correcting electrical aberrance, while also improving cellular metabolic homeostasis, cardiac efficiency and mitochondrial function. This article provides a comprehensive review of the mechanisms responsible for ventricular dyssynchrony-induced cardiac remodelling and its reversal through cardiac resynchronisation therapy, focusing on the influence that these mechanisms exert on cellular metabolism and mitochondrial function. Additionally, it underscores the potential for risk assessment and individualised treatment targeting in dyssynchronous heart failure, using metabolic profiles, mitochondrial function indicators and metabolomic evaluation to enhance the efficacy of CRT and improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gumrai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: