Why the study?
BAV presents unique challenges for TAVI, and evidence on long-term bioprosthetic durability in BAV compared to TAV remains limited.
Does self-expandable TAVI provide similar 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance in bicuspid compared to tricuspid aortic valve stenosis?
Does self-expandable TAVI provide similar 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance in bicuspid compared to tricuspid aortic valve stenosis?
Self-expandable TAVI shows comparable 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis, supporting its use in selected BAV patients.
Comparable 5-year durability supports TAVI in selected BAV patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) presents unique challenges for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and evidence on long-term bioprosthetic durability in an BAV compared to a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) remains limited. We aimed to compare the 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance of self-expandable TAVI in patients with BAV versus TAV stenosis, using propensity score-matched data from a large, real-world, multicentre registry. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre analysis included patients treated with self-expandable TAVI (2009-2020) from the Medtronic One Hospital ClinicalService registry. Patients with at least one echocardiographic follow-up were matched 1 : 1 (n = 106 BAV; n = 106 TAV) based on key clinical and procedural characteristics. Primary endpoints were structural valve deterioration (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF), defined by VARC-3 criteria, analysed as cumulative incidence functions accounting for competing risk of death. All-cause mortality was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of SVD was 1.07% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-5.26] in BAV and 1.79% (95% CI: 0.14-8.50) in TAV (P = 0.829). BVF occurred in 2.38% (95% CI: 0.44-7.62) of BAV and 2.8% (95% CI: 0.47-9.19) of TAV patients (P = 0.782). Hemodynamic performance remained stable over time, with no statistically significant differences between the mean gradients at 5 years (7.8 ± 2.8 mmHg BAV versus 9.5 ± 11.7 mmHg TAV, P = 0.304). All-cause mortality at 5 years was 41.7% (BAV) versus 51.5% (TAV, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In this propensity-matched, real-world multicentre cohort, BAV and TAV patients treated with self-expandable TAVI showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance. These findings are hypothesis-generating and suggest TAVI may be a reasonable option for selected BAV patients, pending further validation from randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massussi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: