Why the study?
Anxiety disorders represent a major public health problem, with wearable technological devices for somatic anxiety symptoms increasingly available, prompting a need to examine device modalities and clinical management implications.
Do wearable devices improve anxiety-related symptoms?
Do wearable devices improve anxiety-related symptoms?
Wearable devices, particularly HRV biofeedback, offer potential benefits for anxiety symptoms, but high-quality clinical evidence is currently lacking.
May support adjunctive HRV biofeedback for somatic anxiety; leaves open efficacy and integration pending controlled trials.
Anxiety disorders are a major public health problem, and a range of wearable technological devices for addressing the somatic symptoms of anxiety are increasingly available. This narrative review summarizes five distinct modalities underlying wearable devices and investigates clinical implications for managing clients using such devices. The literature suggests potential benefits of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback devices, while other modalities (aided meditation, false physiological feedback, electrodermal biofeedback, and respiration biofeedback) are less supported. High‐quality research on the efficacy of such devices is also lacking, particularly in clinical populations. Wearables could offer potential benefits, but may be contraindicated in some cases. Collaborative use of clinical evaluation tools, such as the American Psychiatric Association's application evaluation model, can aid in shared decision‐making about device use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunkin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: