Why the study?
Intravenous thrombolysis is increasingly used in minor stroke, but whether dual antiplatelet therapy is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis in minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke was unknown.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) provide noninferior functional outcomes compared to intravenous alteplase in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke?
Population
760 patients with acute minor nondisabling stroke at 38 hospitals in China
Comparison
Dual antiplatelet therapy vs intravenous alteplase
Design
Multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, noninferiority randomized clinical trial
Follow-up
90 days
Authors
Loading...
DAPT was associated with noninferior 90-day outcomes; leaves open whether it should replace thrombolysis in practice.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) provide noninferior functional outcomes compared to intravenous alteplase in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke?
In patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke presenting within 4.5 hours, DAPT is noninferior to intravenous alteplase for achieving excellent functional outcomes at 90 days.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: