Key result
DAPT matches alteplase for excellent 90-day functional outcomes in minor stroke across circulation territories.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the treatment effects of dual antiplatelet therapy versus alteplase in minor non-disabling stroke were similar across stroke territories.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy improve excellent functional outcome at 90 days compared to intravenous alteplase in patients with minor non-disabling stroke across different stroke territories?
RCT (n=719)
Does dual antiplatelet therapy improve excellent functional outcome at 90 days compared to intravenous alteplase in patients with minor non-disabling stroke across different stroke territories?
Effect estimate: RD 1.5% (ACS), RD -2.1% (PCS) (95% CI -1.5 to 4.6 (ACS), -8.5 to 4.4 (PCS))
p-value: p=0.32 (ACS), 0.53 (PCS)
In patients with minor non-disabling stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy provides similar long-term functional outcomes and better safety compared to intravenous alteplase, regardless of whether the stroke is in the anterior or posterior circulation.
DAPT offers comparable efficacy with better safety than alteplase in minor stroke; extends equivalence across anterior and posterior circulations.
OBJECTIVE: The Antiplatelet versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischaemic Stroke trial has demonstrated the non-inferiority of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to alteplase in minor non-disabling stroke. This prespecified secondary analysis aimed to investigate whether the treatment effects were similar across stroke territories. METHODS: Participants were divided according to stroke territory, which were subdivided into DAPT and alteplase. An excellent functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale scoring 0-1 was primary outcome. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change and early neurological improvement measured by a 2-point decline in NIHSS score at 24 hours were secondary outcomes. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and bleeding events were safety outcomes. Primary analyses adjusted unbalanced baseline characteristics between treatments by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 719 patients were included: 566 in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and 153 in posterior circulation stroke (PCS). Primary outcome was 94.1% in DAPT and 91.7% in alteplase among ACS patients (adjusted risk difference (RD) and 95% CI, 1.5% (-1.5% to 4.6%), p=0.32), while 91.2% in DAPT and 91.8% in alteplase among PCS patients (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -2.1% (-8.5% to 4.4%), p=0.53). Compared with alteplase, DAPT was associated with lower risk of sICH (p=0.03) and bleeding events (p<0.001) in ACS, but only lower risk of bleeding events (p=0.007) in PCS. Additionally, among ACS patients, the alteplase was superior to DAPT in terms of decrease in NIHSS score at 24 hours compared with admission (adjusted geometric mean ratio and 95% CI, -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.03), p=0.005) and early neurological improvement (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -7.2% (-11.6% to -2.7%), p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Among ischaemic stroke with minor non-disabling symptoms, DAPT was similar with intravenous alteplase regarding long-term functional outcome and better safety regardless of ACS or PCS. The potential benefit of intravenous alteplase regarding early neurological improvement in patients with ACS warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03661411.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke (n=719). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Alteplase was evaluated on Excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) (RD 1.5% (ACS), RD -2.1% (PCS), 95% CI -1.5 to 4.6 (ACS), -8.5 to 4.4 (PCS), p=0.32 (ACS), 0.53 (PCS)). In minor stroke, DAPT yielded similar 90-day excellent functional outcomes to alteplase in both anterior (94.1% vs 91.7%; P=0.32) and posterior (91.2% vs 91.8%; P=0.53) circulation territories.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: