A multi-sample evaluation of the measurement structure and function of the modified monetary incentive delay task in adolescents

Figures

• 

  Fig. 1. Brain Regions (A), Conceptual Figure for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Model (B). Harvard-Oxford Bilateral Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc; Yellow) and Anterior Insula (Red) regions imposed on MNI152 2 mm brain. R = Right; L = Left; A = Anterior; P = Posterior.

• 

  Fig. 2. Motivational Processing: Schematics of the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task from the ABCD, AHRB and MLS samples.

• 

  Fig. 3. Group Cohen’s d activation maps for (A) ABCD, (B) AHRB and (C) MLS sample. Threshold: d min = .20 & max = 1.5. Map overlaid on MNI152NLin2009cAsym brain. Cross placed on MNI coordinate associated with Right NAcc [12, 8, –10]. Note: The ‘Win’ cue type in the ABCD/AHRB sample is Pink and in the MLS it is Red.

• 

  Fig. 4. Product-moment correlations between the mean signal intensity for the [L]eft/[R]ight Nucleus Accumbens and Anterior Insula across six contrast types for Run 1 and Run 2 in ABCD, AHRB and MLS samples. Note: Manifest variable [1–28] labels specified in Fig. 5.

• 

  Fig. 5. (A) Exploratory Factor Analysis loadings for the ABCD, AHRB and MLS samples, loadings < .20 are removed from the EFA results; and (B) Factor Intercorrelation matrix (Φ). AD = ABCD; AB = AHRB; MS = MLS; R1 = Run 1, R2 = Run 2. L/R-Nacc = Left/Right Nucleus Accumbens; L/R-Ins = Left/Right Anterior Insula.

• 

  Fig. 6. Factor Congruence across (A) data-driven factors for ABCD (AD), AHRB (AB) and MLS (MS) samples and (B) relabeled data-driven factors based on multidimensional and qualitatively similarity.

• 

  Fig. 7. Differences in estimated Cohen’s d group activity between Runs [Run 1 - Run 2] for (A) ABCD, (B) AHRB and (C) MLS samples, and (D) pairwise similarity (Spearman’s rho) between run Cohen’s d maps.