Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A major goal of the open science movement is to make more scientific information available to non-specialists, but it has been difficult to meaningfully achieve that goal. In response, this paper argues for two steps: (1) focusing on the scientific content that is most relevant to non-specialist audiences; and (2) packaging that content in meaningful ways for those audiences. The paper uses a case study involving a major environmental health issue (namely, PFAS pollution) to illustrate how the proponents of open science can work with groups like government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and extension services to implement these two steps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin C. Elliott (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: