Why the study?
Deep diaphragmatic breathing helps children cope with anxiety, stress, and pain, but a simple biofeedback method to quantify breathing compliance in a mobile smartphone app was needed.
Does paced deep breathing guided by a smartphone app alter the relative synchronized inspiration/expiration heart rate ratio compared to spontaneous breathing in children?
Does paced deep breathing guided by a smartphone app alter the relative synchronized inspiration/expiration heart rate ratio compared to spontaneous breathing in children?
An HR-I:Esync level of 1.1 can serve as an age-independent threshold for quantifying breathing compliance in pediatric biofeedback apps.
Mobile biofeedback may boost pediatric breathing compliance for anxiety; leaves open efficacy in perioperative settings pending trials.
Background Deep diaphragmatic breathing, also called belly breathing, is a popular behavioral intervention that helps children cope with anxiety, stress, and their experience of pain. Combining physiological monitoring with accessible mobile technology can motivate children to comply with this intervention through biofeedback and gaming. These innovative technologies have the potential to improve patient experience and compliance with strategies that reduce anxiety, change the experience of pain, and enhance self-regulation during distressing medical procedures. Objective The aim of this paper was to describe a simple biofeedback method for quantifying breathing compliance in a mobile smartphone app. Methods A smartphone app was developed that combined pulse oximetry with an animated protocol for paced deep breathing. We collected photoplethysmogram data during spontaneous and subsequently paced deep breathing in children. Two measures, synchronized respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSAsync) and the corresponding relative synchronized inspiration/expiration heart rate ratio (HR-I:Esync), were extracted from the photoplethysmogram. Results Data collected from 80 children aged 5-17 years showed a positive RSAsync effect in all participants during paced deep breathing, with a median (IQR; range) HR-I:Esync ratio of 1.26 (1.16-1.35; 1.01-1.60) during paced deep breathing compared to 0.98 (0.96-1.02; 0.82-1.18) during spontaneous breathing (median difference 0.25, 95% CI 0.23-0.30; P<.001). The measured HR-I:Esync values appeared to be independent of age. Conclusions An HR-I:Esync level of 1.1 was identified as an age-independent threshold for programming the breathing pattern for optimal compliance in biofeedback.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petersen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: