Why the study?
Do new antithrombotic drugs (direct factor X or thrombin inhibitors) provide effective and safe alternatives to heparins and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
Do new antithrombotic drugs (direct factor X or thrombin inhibitors) provide effective and safe alternatives to heparins and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?
This review summarizes the development, efficacy, safety, and clinical application of direct oral anticoagulants for VTE treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
May guide DOAC selection for VTE and AF; leaves open optimal real-world monitoring strategies.
Tripodi A, Palareti G (IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Hospital Foundation and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; S.Orsola‐Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy). New anticoagulant drugs for treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (Review). J Intern Med 2012; 271 : 554–565. Venous thromboembolism (including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and atrial fibrillation are common conditions in Western countries. The mainstay of treatment and prevention for these diseases is fast‐acting anticoagulant drugs such as heparins and vitamin K antagonists. The use of these drugs is, however, complex and demanding for both patients and physicians. Recently, new antithrombotic drugs that act directly by inhibiting activated coagulation factors such as factor X or thrombin have been developed and investigated in phase III clinical trials. The aim of this article is to review: (i) the need to develop new drugs; (ii) their efficacy/safety as demonstrated in clinical trials; (iii) the need for laboratory monitoring and (iv) the direction towards the use of these new drugs in the real‐life clinical situation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripodi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: