Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 8, 2006International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation with versus without a follow-up intervention rendered by telephone (Luebeck follow-up trial): overall and gender-specific effects

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does a nurse-managed monthly telephone follow-up intervention reduce the Framingham risk score in patients after acute cardiac events following inpatient cardiac rehabilitation?

Population

343 patients following 3 weeks of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation after acute cardiac events

Comparison

Nurse-managed secondary prevention program… vs Written information only

Design

RCT, randomly assigned to either of two study groups

Follow-up

12 months

Authors

OMOskar MittagCCClaudia ChinaEHEike Hoberg

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Nurse-managed telephone follow-up sustains lower Framingham scores after rehab; confirms efficacy of remote secondary prevention, especially in men.

Structured PICO

Does a nurse-managed monthly telephone follow-up intervention reduce the Framingham risk score in patients after acute cardiac events following inpatient cardiac rehabilitation?

P
Population
343 patients following 3 weeks of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation after acute cardiac events
I
Intervention
Nurse-managed secondary prevention program consisting of monthly telephone contacts by specially trained nurses over 1 year
C
Comparator
Written information only
O
Outcome
Framingham risk score at 12 monthssurrogate

Telephone counselling by specially trained nurses is an effective strategy to maintain the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and reduce coronary risk factors, particularly in men.

Cite This Study

Mittag et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d4033b97b7d2d4f83e154https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0b013e328010ba9a
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of a health education programme with telephone follow‐up during cardiac rehabilitation1994 · 94 citations
  2. 2Long-Term Survival Differences Among Low-Anxious, High-Anxious and Repressive Copers Enrolled in the Montreal Heart Attack Readjustment Trial2002 · 86 citations
  3. 3A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction1994 · 746 citations
  4. 4The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial2003 · 98 citations
  5. 5Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH)2003 · 383 citations