Why the study?
What is the endocardial-epicardial distribution of myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by CT in symptomatic patients without significant CAD, and what factors determine it?
What is the endocardial-epicardial distribution of myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by CT in symptomatic patients without significant CAD, and what factors determine it?
In symptomatic patients without obstructive CAD, static CT perfusion demonstrates lower myocardial perfusion reserve in the subendocardium compared to the subepicardium, with obesity further reducing MPR across all layers.
CT may aid detecting subendocardial perfusion deficits without CAD; leaves open BMI's causal impact on layer-specific MPR.
AIM: Previous animal studies have demonstrated differences in perfusion and perfusion reserve between the subendocardium and subepicardium. 320-row computed tomography (CT) with sub-millimetre spatial resolution allows for the assessment of transmural differences in myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in humans. We aimed to test the hypothesis that MPR in all myocardial layers is determined by age, gender, and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with ischaemic symptoms or equivalent but without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 149 patients enrolled in the CORE320 study with symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia and absence of significant CAD by invasive coronary angiography were scanned with static rest and stress CT perfusion. Myocardial attenuation densities were assessed at rest and during adenosine stress, segmented into 3 myocardial layers and 13 segments. MPR was higher in the subepicardium compared with the subendocardium (124% interquartile range [45, 235] vs. 68% [22,102], P < 0.001). Moreover, MPR in the septum was lower than in the inferolateral and anterolateral segments of the myocardium (55% [19, 104] vs. 89% [37, 168] and 124% [54, 270], P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, high body mass index was significantly associated with reduced MPR in all myocardial layers when adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients without significant coronary artery stenosis, distinct differences in endocardial-epicardial distribution of perfusion reserve may be demonstrated with static CT perfusion. Low MPR in all myocardial layers was observed specifically in obese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kühl et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: