Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Robotic systems are increasingly utilised to improve clinical outcomes in prostate interventions. METHODS: We enroled 20 patients to verify the clinical feasibility of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided robot-assisted prostate biopsy (PBx). For each patient, controlled trials of systematic 12-core PBx were initially conducted manually using a biopsy gun, followed by a 3-core cognitive fusion targeted biopsy performed by the hand-held robot. RESULTS: The targeting errors for robot-assisted biopsy and freehand biopsy were 3.71 ± 1.41 mm and 3.94 ± 1.49 mm, respectively. Their cancer core rates were 19.1% and 12.6%, and the average duration of each biopsy was 6.94 min and 1.62 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The robot's sampling success rate was lower than that of freehand with a biopsy gun in the clinical trial. However, robot-assisted PBx has shown improved cancer core rate, slightly enhanced surgical accuracy, and the capability to reach clinically significant tumours' 5 mm error range, all demonstrating its clinical value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: